Pulse lineResearch With Heart Logo

Validity and reliability of self-reported diabetes in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

TitleValidity and reliability of self-reported diabetes in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2012
AuthorsSchneider ALC, Pankow JS, Heiss G
Secondary AuthorsSelvin E
JournalAm J Epidemiol
Volume176
Issue8
Pagination738-43
Date Published2012 Oct 15
ISSN1476-6256
KeywordsAlgorithms, Atherosclerosis, Biomarkers, Blood Glucose, Cohort Studies, Community Health Services, Diabetes Complications, Diabetes Mellitus, Fasting, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin A, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prevalence, Prospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Self Report, Sensitivity and Specificity, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States
Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the validity of prevalent and incident self-reported diabetes compared with multiple reference definitions and to assess the reliability (repeatability) of a self-reported diagnosis of diabetes. Data from 10,321 participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study who attended visit 4 (1996-1998) were analyzed. Prevalent self-reported diabetes was compared with reference definitions defined by fasting glucose and medication use obtained at visit 4. Incident self-reported diabetes was assessed during annual follow-up telephone calls and was compared with reference definitions defined by fasting glucose, hemoglobin A1c, and medication use obtained during an in-person visit attended by a subsample of participants (n = 1,738) in 2004-2005. The sensitivity of prevalent self-reported diabetes ranged from 58.5% to 70.8%, and specificity ranged from 95.6% to 96.8%, depending on the reference definition. Similarly, the sensitivity of incident self-reported diabetes ranged from 55.9% to 80.4%, and specificity ranged from 84.5% to 90.6%. Percent positive agreement of self-reported diabetes during 9 years of repeat assessments ranged from 92.7% to 95.4%. Both prevalent self-reported diabetes and incident self-reported diabetes were 84%-97% specific and 55%-80% sensitive as compared with reference definitions using glucose and medication criteria. Self-reported diabetes was >92% reliable over time.

DOI10.1093/aje/kws156
Alternate JournalAm J Epidemiol
PubMed ID23013620
PubMed Central IDPMC3571247
Grant ListHHSN268201100012C / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
HHSN268201100009I / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
HHSN268201100010C / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
HHSN268201100008C / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
HHSN268201100005G / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
HHSN268201100008I / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
HHSN268201100005C / / PHS HHS / United States
R01 DK089174 / DK / NIDDK NIH HHS / United States
HHSN268201100007C / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
HHSN268201100009C / / PHS HHS / United States
R01DK089174 / DK / NIDDK NIH HHS / United States
HHSN268201100011I / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
HHSN268201100011C / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
HHSN268201100010C / / PHS HHS / United States
K01 DK076595 / DK / NIDDK NIH HHS / United States
HHSN268201100006C / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
HHSN268201100008C / / PHS HHS / United States
HHSN268201100012C / / PHS HHS / United States
HHSN268201100005I / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
HHSN268201100007C / / PHS HHS / United States
HHSN268201100009C / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
HHSN268201100011C / / PHS HHS / United States
HHSN268201100005C / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
HHSN268201100007I / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
T32 DK062707 / DK / NIDDK NIH HHS / United States
HHSN268201100006C / / PHS HHS / United States