An HIV prevention protocol reviewed at 15 national sites: how do ethics committees protect communities?

TitleAn HIV prevention protocol reviewed at 15 national sites: how do ethics committees protect communities?
Publication TypePublication
Year of Publication2008
AuthorsDeeds BGriffin, Castillo M, Beason Z, Cunningham SD, Ellen JM, Peralta L
Corporate AuthorsAdolescent Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions
JournalJ Empir Res Hum Res Ethics
Volume3
Issue2
Pagination77-86
Date Published2008 Jun
ISSN1556-2646
Abstract

<p>To learn whether ethics committees reviewing community-based participatory research concentrate on the protection of communities, in addition to individual participants, data from 15 sites were analyzed. Eighty-two ethics committee concerns related to consent (35%), protocol procedures (49%), data collection (17%), and HIPAA (6%) were identified. Concerns generally involved individual level subject issues; only 17% were related to community issues. To improve community-level protections in research, the authors recommend that both ethics committee members and research staff receive education concerning protection and respect for communities, that a community member group be established to advise researchers throughout the planning and implementation of community-level studies and that local ethics committee boards include members with community-level experience.</p>

DOI10.1525/jer.2008.3.2.77
Alternate JournalJ Empir Res Hum Res Ethics
PubMed ID19385747
PubMed Central IDPMC5542397
Grant ListU01 HD040474 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U01 HD040506 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U01 HD040533 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States